Background the current regulation in china does not allow one entity to operate multiple financial services simultaneously . after china ’ s entry to wto , there have been significant changes in china ’ s financial industry structure . local financial institutions have to face severe competition from foreign counterparts , who have begun to enjoy national treatment provided by gats 加入wto后,中国金融业面临的内外部环境发生了急剧的变化,一方面西方强国金融机构将直接进入中国市场,另一方面将接受服务贸易总协定( gats )各项主要原则的约束,对来自境外的金融机构提供与国内金融机构相同的待遇。
China committed to lower trade barriers in virtually every sector of the economy , provide national treatment ( treat imports on an equal basis with domestically - produced goods ) , improve market access to goods and services imported from the united states and other wto members , and protect intellectual property rights ( ipr ) 报告对贸易统计资料进行的分析认为，美国从中国的进口增长，但美国从太平洋沿岸其他地区的进口出现滑落，因为其他国家的公司将产品的最后组装工序转移至中国。
At present , the nation is making a great effort to promote financial system reform and the stock - holding system reform of state - owned commercial bank is under progress ; according to the promise we made for joining wto , foreign investment bank will enjoy national treatment in 2006 , all of which are the inner and outer stimulus of promoting the postal finance system reform , bettering postal finance team building and improving the financial 中国邮政储蓄银行成立后,大力发展新业务,培育邮政储蓄新的收入增长点是我们今后工作的重点,也是本文的研究主旨。中国邮政储蓄银行的组建,可以说是邮政储蓄一个新的发展契机。邮政储蓄应该抓住这一发展契机,从单一吸储的经营模式向以资金运作为主,多种金融业务共同发展的经营方式转变,从而探索出一条崭新的中国邮政储蓄发展之路。
The principle of national treatment established in the field of international protection of intellectual property rights is of epoch - making significance , it allows states parties to the treaty undertake the following treaty obligations : to comply with the legal provisions of states intellectual property rights of nationals of other states parties to recognize and protect intellectual property rights 在具体的涉外知识产权案件中,纯粹适用条约规定的最低保护标准,可能使一个案件不能得到有效的解决。如果仅依靠体制本身来克服这些缺陷,根本方法在于制定一部国际知识产权统一实体法。但显而易见,这种方案在短时期内又是不可奢求的。
In order to attract the foreign insurance capital , the government has given a lot of revenue preference to the foreign insurance enterprise . the domestic insurance enterprise ’ s tax burden has been higher than the foreign insurance enterprise . this is in violation of the equality principle of tax and the national treatment principle of tax 我国政府为了吸引外资发展保险经济,给予了外资保险企业过多的税收优惠政策,使得我国内资保险企业税收负担高于外资保险企业,分别适用于内外资保险企业的两套企业所得税存在很大差别。
